Fb CEO Mark Zuckerberg, an outspoken proponent of local weather change activism, owns a private jet which burned greater than $158,000 value of jet gas in lower than two months.
Zuckerberg’s jet, a Gulfstream G650, has burned at the least $158,448 value of jet gas throughout 28 totally different journeys between Aug. 20 and Oct. 15, based on knowledge from flight monitoring software program ADS-B Change compiled by programmer Jack Sweeney. The jet has crisscrossed throughout the continental United States, touring to Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, New York, Texas and several other different states usually earlier than returning to its obvious base in San Jose, Calif.
In that point span, Zuckerberg’s non-public jet emitted greater than 253 metric tons of carbon, a greenhouse fuel that specialists say is contributing to international warming and local weather change. By comparability, the common American has a complete carbon footprint of 16 tons a 12 months whereas the common particular person worldwide burns about 4 tons a 12 months, based on The Nature Conservancy.
The Gulfstream recorded a number of long-distance cross-country treks during the last two months, but in addition made a number of brief journeys, the info confirmed. For instance, the jet traveled simply 18 miles between two Arizona airstrips on Oct. 15 and 28 miles from Carlsbad, Calif., to San Diego on Aug. 28.

However regardless of his jet’s giant carbon footprint, which is 15 occasions bigger than the common US citizen’s carbon footprint, Zuckerberg has often given cash to local weather change causes and has spoken out on the significance of fixing international warming for future generations. Fb has additionally sought to combat climate misinformation on its platform.
“It’s time for our generation-defining public works,” Zuckerberg stated throughout a Harvard College graduation handle in 2017. “How about stopping local weather change earlier than we destroy the planet and getting hundreds of thousands of individuals concerned manufacturing and putting in photo voltaic panels?”
“We get that our best challenges want international responses too — no nation can struggle local weather change alone or forestall pandemics,” he continued. “Progress now requires coming collectively not simply as cities or nations, but in addition as a world neighborhood.”
In 2021, Zuckerberg stated a part of the explanation he was dedicated to advancing digital actuality expertise was as a result of it could be “higher for society and the planet” than touring on “automobiles and planes and all that” in an interview with expertise publication The Info.
Months later, Fb introduced it could launch the Local weather Science Info Heart and shell out $1 million to organizations working to fight local weather misinformation.
“Local weather change is likely one of the most pressing points impacting our world at the moment, and Meta is dedicated to serving to sort out this international problem,” Fb dad or mum firm Meta stated within the Sept. 16, 2021, announcement.

And the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, a non-public basis based by Zuckerberg and his spouse Priscilla Chan in 2015, has contributed tens of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} to local weather initiative. In February, the group stated it could give $44 million to the analysis and improvement of applied sciences that take away carbon emissions from the air.
A consultant for Zuckerberg didn’t reply to a request for remark.
Zuckerberg is the newest high-profile local weather activist superstar whose private jet usage has raised eyebrows. Leonardo DiCaprio, Harrison Ford and Steven Spielberg have every often traveled on non-public jets whereas expressing concern about human-caused global warming.
Spielberg’s Gulfstream G650 burned $116,000 worth of jet fuel between June and August.
“I’m petrified of [global warming],” Spielberg remarked in 2018. “World warming is a scientific actuality. It’s not a political trick. It’s a real piece of actual, measurable, quantifiable science.”
“You recognize whenever you’re not aware of one thing that might pose a hazard to your youngsters and grandchildren?” he continued. “Then you definitely simply go blithely via life with aerosol cans and doing all kinds of issues which might be depleting the ozone.”