“Nuclear conflict is a part of our strategic tradition. Sure, we’d begin one if our homeland, our lifestyle, was threatened, completely. Why wouldn’t we?”
That’s what a retired Russian diplomat instructed me on the sidelines of a Monitor 2 dialogue between US, Russian and Chinese language specialists again in 2012. And to be sincere, for a number of years, I didn’t imagine him. I took his feedback as bragging, atomic machismo, if you’ll.
The context of the dialog was a response to a query to my Russian colleague as regards to Moscow’s nuclear-weapons doctrine and pondering. Russia for a number of years has believed within the idea of escalating nuclear tensions to de-escalate tensions, or what protection students name “escalate to de-escalate.”
Like a caged animal
The pondering goes that if Moscow’s precise territory was below menace by overwhelming typical pressure — suppose a NATO assault — then Russia reserved the suitable to reply with tactical nuclear weapons, or extra, as Moscow has no strategy to win a long-term typical conflict in opposition to NATO forces.
In reality, in war-game simulations I’ve participated in for a number of years now, we at all times assume that Russia would use tactical nuclear weapons in opposition to NATO if a conflict ever did get away.
However such pondering leaves a number of floor uncovered. NATO is not exactly itching for a struggle with Moscow or to assault its territory, even with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine nonetheless unfolding.
Again in 2012, I pressed my Russian colleague, asking in what different conditions Russia would use nuclear weapons, if any. He defined that “if something threatens our capability to exist as a nation and prosper, it’s my view that we’d use nuclear weapons.”
I didn’t imagine him then, however I do now.
With Russian President Vladimir Putin now placing his nation’s nuclear forces on alert status, Moscow is signaling to us that current arms shipments, sanctions, lashings within the media and strain positioned on the Putin authorities are rattling nerves.
Get the latest updates in the Russia-Ukraine conflict with the Post’s live coverage.
Putin is attempting to inform us in no unsure phrases that we’re coming near his geopolitical pink traces and, like a caged animal, he’ll strike again if we apply an excessive amount of strain. That would even imply utilizing nuclear weapons.
Current sanctions which have focused Russian banks and their access to the SWIFT messaging network had been certainly the triggers for Putin to flex his nuclear muscle tissues. With 10 Russian banks now basically locked out of worldwide markets and Moscow’s Central Financial institution restricted in the way it can use its $600 billion in foreign-exchange reserves, Putin is now going through what may very well be a monetary disaster on par with what Boris Yeltsin confronted in 1998, when the Russian financial system almost collapsed.
Deal or no deal
The excellent news, if there may be any, is that peace talks seem to be underway whereby either side may come to some form of settlement to finish hostilities. Ukraine, for instance, may make a proper pledge to not be a part of NATO in title solely, however so tightly knit itself to the alliance and the EU that Russia would suppose twice a few second invasion. Russia might settle for that, figuring out its forces would want at this level to depend on heavy weapons, large-scale bombing, a whole bunch extra missile strikes and rather more total pressure to really take over Ukraine.
However right here is the place issues may go from dangerous to worse. If either side can’t come to a deal, Putin might determine to truly go all-in against Kyiv, figuring out {that a} scorched-earth coverage and profitable at any value is best than taking weeks or months to take the nation in full. The extent of carnage we’d see could be one thing akin to photographs from World Warfare II: bombed-out cities, our bodies on the streets and complete carnage all over the place.
The world could be horrified — and would demand motion in opposition to Russia. What would the West do? It’s doubtless that extra weapons would movement into Ukraine on a grand scale, placing extra strain on Putin to reply. Extra sanctions would then observe, together with disconnecting all of Russia’s banks and monetary establishments from SWIFT, together with entities tied to Russian vitality, the lifeblood of Moscow’s financial system.
At that time, Russia’s lifestyle, its capability to exist, could be threatened. The Putin regime could be threatened. What, oh, what would Moscow do then? Suppose “escalate to de-escalate” — and that might imply one thing horrible for all of us.
